skip to Main Content

Why Financial Institutions Must Have Lateral Movement Protection

How can financial institutions protect valuable assets by fortifying defenses with layered security and lateral movement protection?

As a cornerstone of the global economy, the banking and financial sector finds itself at the frontline of the cyber battlefield. Cybercriminals, drawn to the vast stores of valuable data and the direct financial gain possibilities, launch complex and relentless attacks on these institutions. In today’s interconnected digital landscape, one significant area of vulnerability is lateral movement – the technique attackers use to navigate through a network after gaining initial access. Lateral movement protection, a key component of layered security strategy, is thus imperative for financial institutions.

The Challenges of Modern Financial Cybersecurity

Financial institutions manage a unique array of sensitive data, from personal information to confidential financial records. Consequently, they are attractive targets for cybercriminals, resulting in a high frequency of advanced persistent threats (APTs), ransomware, spear-phishing, and more.

Compounding the risk is the adoption of digital transformation strategies. With cloud-based systems, digital banking, and complex supply chains, the attack surface expands considerably, rendering traditional perimeter-based security measures less effective. Thus, the concern shifts to threats originating inside the network – threats exploiting lateral movement.

Understanding Lateral Movement Protection

Lateral movement refers to cyber attackers’ techniques to navigate a network after obtaining initial access. This process allows attackers to search for key assets, elevate their privileges, and establish a stronghold on the network.

The stealthy nature of lateral movement can make detection challenging. Threat actors often utilize valid credentials and mimic legitimate traffic to blend in, staying under the radar until the attack’s ultimate objective is achieved – whether data exfiltration, encryption for ransom, or other damaging actions.

The ramifications of a cyber attack for banks are severe and far-reaching, impacting both the financial institution and its customers. Immediate financial losses can result from theft or ransom demands, while operational disruption can halt vital services, affecting everything from day-to-day transactions to large-scale transfers and trades. Regulatory penalties can be imposed if an insurance provider or bank fails to comply with cybersecurity norms, such as those stipulated by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) or the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS). The longer-term consequences, though, may be even more damaging. These include reputational harm leading to loss of customer trust and a subsequent decrease in customer base, which can negatively impact revenue. Furthermore, remediation costs can be substantial, from improving weakened cybersecurity infrastructure to the potential litigation costs if the breach results in customer data being compromised. Therefore, a single cyber attack can have a domino effect, triggering multiple issues that can threaten the very stability of the bank.

Given the potential damage of attacks leveraging lateral movement, financial institutions must prioritize this aspect in their cybersecurity strategy.

Embracing a Layered Security Approach

Addressing lateral movement threats effectively requires a layered security approach, moving beyond the outdated perimeter-based models. By creating multiple lines of defense, a layered approach ensures that even if one security control fails, others continue to protect the network.


Microsegmentation plays a key role in countering lateral movement threats. By dividing the network into smaller, isolated segments, each with its own security policies, access controls, and firewalls, lateral movement is hindered significantly. Even if an attacker breaches one segment, the rest remain isolated and secure.

Behavioral Analytics

Behavioral analytics adds another level of sophistication to lateral movement protection. By establishing a ‘normal’ network behavior baseline, systems can detect anomalies indicative of a potential threat, often flagging lateral movement attempts.

Robust Access Management

Implementing least-privilege access policies, wherein users and systems are granted minimal access necessary to perform their tasks, can also limit lateral movement possibilities. Combined with robust identity and access management (IAM) solutions, these controls help prevent unauthorized access attempts.

Regular Vulnerability Assessments and Patching

Regular vulnerability assessments and timely patching are crucial in mitigating lateral movement risks. Unpatched vulnerabilities can offer easy ingress points for attackers who can then move laterally across networks.

Lateral Movement Protection: Protecting the Inevitable

Given the continuous evolution of cyber threats and the expanding digital ecosystem of financial institutions, lateral movement protection must be central to a robust cybersecurity strategy. By integrating layered security measures, institutions can proactively defend against potential threats, mitigate risks, and safeguard critical assets.

It’s not a question of “if” but “when” a cyber attack will occur. However, with the right lateral movement protection in place, financial institutions can ensure that any breach does not escalate into a devastating cyber incident.

Share This


Related posts

Back To Top
TrueFort Emblem Logo

Truefort customer support

TrueFort customers receive 24×7 support by phone and email, and all software maintenance, releases, and updates

For questions about our support policy, please contact your TrueFort account manager or our presales team at

Support Hotline

Email Support